Nara University of Education Academic Repository >
100. 学内刊行物 (紀要、研究報告) >
101-3. 奈良教育大学紀要 (人文・社会科学, 自然科学) >
第65巻 第1号 人文・社会科学 (2016) >

このアイテムの引用には次の識別子を使用してください: http://hdl.handle.net/10105/11036

タイトル: 志向性と歴史性─フッサールにおける志向的意識の歴史内在性─
その他のタイトル: Intentionality and Historicity:On the Historical Immanence of Intentional Consciousness in Husserl
著者: 梶尾, 悠史
キーワード: 現象学
発行日: 2016年11月30日
出版者: 奈良教育大学
収録雑誌名: 奈良教育大学紀要. 人文・社会科学
巻: 65
号: 1
開始ページ: 77
終了ページ: 83
ISSN: 05472393
収録種別: 紀要論文
抄録: There are two standpoints in Husserl’s phenomenology: subjectivism and historicism. According to Husserl’s subjectivism, things are constituted by an act of consciousness. For example, a desk is constituted (perceived) only if some appearances are regarded as the manner in which the desk is given to consciousness. The same explanation applies to ideal objects. For instance, the number “5” is constituted (known) only if a subject regards a certain representation of a group (such as a group of apples) as the manner in which “5” is given. However, Husserl also emphasizes the historical structure of knowledge of ideal objects. From this perspective, ideal objects are thought to have a public nature in the sense that they are possessed by humankind before being known by each subject. Thus, it is clear that the range of this historical interest is not entirely contained in that of the subjective one. We must ask how these two standpoints relate to each other in Husserl’s phenomenology. We confront a serious discrepancy between subjectivism and historicism, especially when we identify the former with “non-historical apriorism” because of the following idea: the evidence of knowledge is found only in individual subjects who actually recognize it. It is true that this kind of apriorism is incompatible with historicism, which focuses on the intersubjective aspect of our knowledge. I do not interpret Husserl’s phenomenology as an apriorism in the above sense. The purpose of this paper is to examine the historical or intersubjective aspect of the theory of constitution and to suggest a consistent understanding of Husserl’s phenomenology. For this purpose, I want to clear the historical immanence of intentional consciousness by referring to Husserl’s Origin of Geometry.
言語: jpn
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10105/11036
出現コレクション:第65巻 第1号 人文・社会科学 (2016)


ファイル 記述 サイズフォーマット
NUE65_1_77-83.pdf391.98 kBAdobe PDF見る/開く



Valid XHTML 1.0! Powered by DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2007 MIT and Hewlett-Packard - 問合せ